Not as far as I know. LJ's auth methods are pretty primitive.
I generally don't like it when services require handing their (single, master) password to other services. (Email has been like this since forever; I was gratified to see that Fastmail allows you to create named, randomly generated "app passwords" with limited scope and individual revocability.) In this case I trust DW more than LJ so whatevs. Is that not true for you, or do you have a different concern?
no subject
I generally don't like it when services require handing their (single, master) password to other services. (Email has been like this since forever; I was gratified to see that Fastmail allows you to create named, randomly generated "app passwords" with limited scope and individual revocability.) In this case I trust DW more than LJ so whatevs. Is that not true for you, or do you have a different concern?